<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Movie Revenue &#124; Film Earnings &#124; Box Office &#187; disney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.movierevenue.com/index.php/tag/disney/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.movierevenue.com</link>
	<description>numbers matter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:24:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A Christmas Carol number 1</title>
		<link>http://www.movierevenue.com/index.php/1-movie/a-christmas-carol-number-1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.movierevenue.com/index.php/1-movie/a-christmas-carol-number-1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[#1 Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a christmas carol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animation movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim carrey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movierevenue.com/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8216;A Christmas Carol&#8217; had the top movie revenue for the week.  Jim Carrey delivers a solid start to the holiday season box office, even though sales were down from this time last year.
Disney&#8217;s animation movie cost $175 million to get out of the gates, and it has returned $31 million in movie revenue in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;A Christmas Carol&#8217; had the top movie revenue for the week.  Jim Carrey delivers a solid start to the holiday season box office, even though sales were down from this time last year.</p>
<p>Disney&#8217;s animation movie cost $175 million to get out of the gates, and it has returned $31 million in movie revenue in its first week.</p>
<p>A long run abroad, combined with some bad weather on the weekends could blow up the revenue numbers for A Christmas Carol going forward.  The U.S. had a mild weekend this weekend which could have impacted Disney&#8217;s box office results.  </p>
<p>CNN&#8217;s <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Movies/11/08/boxoffice.christmas.carol.ew/">article</a> noted <em>The $175 million animated movie, which utilized performance-capture technology to allow Jim Carrey to play multiple roles from Charles Dickens&#8217; beloved story, represented the best opening in director Robert Zemeckis&#8217; career.</p>
<p>And even though &#8216;Carol&#8217; performed a bit below expectations, the family film should hold up well in the coming weeks, especially since it&#8217;ll be playing on nearly 200 pricey IMAX screens until &#8220;Avatar&#8221; opens on December 18.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.movierevenue.com/index.php/1-movie/a-christmas-carol-number-1.html#respond">Do you think Disney&#8217;s A Christmas Carol Will Earn Back What It Cost To Produce?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.movierevenue.com/index.php/1-movie/a-christmas-carol-number-1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Jim Carrey Good, A Christmas Carol Not So Good</title>
		<link>http://www.movierevenue.com/index.php/general-chatter/review-jim-carrey-good-a-chirstmas-carol-not-so-goo.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.movierevenue.com/index.php/general-chatter/review-jim-carrey-good-a-chirstmas-carol-not-so-goo.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Chatter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a christmas carol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gary oldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim carrey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movierevenue.com/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The early reviews are in and the Washington Post is saying that they like the efforts of the cast, but that the animation was distracting and inhuman.
Disney&#8217;s A Christmas Carol
Too much spirit, too little heart
&#8230;despite the Herculean efforts of the voice cast, which includes Jim Carrey as Scrooge and the ghosts that visit him, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The early reviews are in and the Washington Post is saying that they like the efforts of the cast, but that the animation was distracting and inhuman.</p>
<p>Disney&#8217;s A Christmas Carol<br />
Too much spirit, too little heart</p>
<p>&#8230;<em>despite the Herculean efforts of the voice cast, which includes Jim Carrey as Scrooge and the ghosts that visit him, and Gary Oldman as Scrooge&#8217;s dead partner Jacob Marley, Scrooge&#8217;s clerk Bob Cratchit and Cratchit&#8217;s son Tiny Tim. That the film takes advantage of the latest 3-D technology isn&#8217;t entirely a bad thing either</em>&#8230;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/05/AR2009110501741.html">Read The Whole Review</a>.</p>
<p>Disney&#8217;s A Christmas Carol Teaser<br />
<!-- Smart Youtube --><span class="youtube"><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YV7SwUmSuvc&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YV7SwUmSuvc&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355" ></embed><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /></object></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.movierevenue.com/index.php/general-chatter/review-jim-carrey-good-a-chirstmas-carol-not-so-goo.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marvel Movie Revenue Way Down</title>
		<link>http://www.movierevenue.com/index.php/general-chatter/marvel-movie-revenue-way-down.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.movierevenue.com/index.php/general-chatter/marvel-movie-revenue-way-down.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Chatter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marvel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movierevenue.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[.. but they made a profit, while their restructuring with new parent corporation Disney is ongoing.

Marvel Entertainment 3Q Profit Down 60% On Lower Film Rev 
 Marvel Entertainment Inc. (MVL), which is being bought by Walt Disney Co. (DIS), reported third-quarter earnings slumped 60% on lower film revenue, as well as lower licensing sales related [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.. but they made a profit, while their restructuring with new parent corporation Disney is ongoing.<br />
<img src="http://www.movierevenue.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/marvel.jpg" alt="marvel" title="marvel" width="329" height="127" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-67" /><br />
<strong>Marvel Entertainment 3Q Profit Down 60% On Lower Film Rev </strong><br />
<em> Marvel Entertainment Inc. (MVL), which is being bought by Walt Disney Co. (DIS), reported third-quarter earnings slumped 60% on lower film revenue, as well as lower licensing sales related to last year&#8217;s &#8220;Iron Man&#8221; and &#8220;Incredible Hulk&#8221; films.</p>
<p>On Aug. 31, Disney, the largest U.S. media company by market value, said it agreed to pay $4 billion for Marvel, the creator of comic-book characters Spider-Man, the X-Men and thousands of others.</p>
<p>Marvel last month said it wouldn&#8217;t provide a financial outlook for 2009 or next year given the proposed acquisition. In August, the company had raised its 2009 earnings and sales forecast, citing a stronger-than-expected performance in the first half.</p>
<p>The company Tuesday posted a profit of $20.4 million, or 26 cents a share, down from $50.6 million, or 64 cents a share, a year earlier. Net sales tumbled 42% to $105.7 million, on a lower level of film activity and related licensing. </em>&#8230;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091103-705880.html">Read The Whole Wall Street Journal Article</a>.</p>
<p>Is this fancy Hollywood smoke &#038; mirrors accounting? <a href="http://www.movierevenue.com/index.php/general-chatter/marvel-movie-revenue-way-down.html#respond">Tell us what you think.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.movierevenue.com/index.php/general-chatter/marvel-movie-revenue-way-down.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
